![]() ![]() If you had a chance to play a war-game, what would you rather be: a foot soldier or an admiral? The foot soldier is a victim of circumstances, the admiral can call the shot. A tree, a barn, a high fence, the bushes all stop him from seeing beyond.Īn admiral has the whole region on a map with platoons and entire armies laid out on a map where he can move these and see how the results shape up, and then make a decision. The foot soldier sees as far as his eyes can see… not very far. Imagine being a foot soldier in a war, or alternatively an admiral in a war. In essence, the higher it is, the higher your vantage point. I can promise you that at a higher vibration you see a very different picture of the game. But I am sure that your vibration matters. Where does Source come into this picture? It is harder if you look at it as “real life” and the stakes are high, and you may even suffer or die. This is easier to do from the vantage point of “your computer game.” Will this “unfortunate turn of things” cause a quickening in you, or will you throw your hands up and give up? In any situation you have the choice to look at a breakdown as an act of fate, a bad news, a tragedy, drama or as a challenge.Īnd although it came from the “outside,” you call the shot: will you rise to the occasion? The moment you call yourself a powerful manager of your life, of yourself, you really have this choice. And they cause breakdowns for themselves (you could call them challenges) to cause the quickening. There are a few people who are self-managing. They use only a fragment of their capacities then.īut when you cause a breakdown, they have a choice to rise to the occasion, to cause a quickening in their being, or not. People can’t be judged by how they behave in peace-time. someone who brings out the best in people by causing breakdowns. gets people to get the job done, get something from A to B. I have considered myself a powerful manager. This is a question for the Real-Me, the one that is animating the computer-me. So the question is: how do I want to play the game? In the second case, if I just didn’t take the step, I would prolong cowardice, and potentially I would play the rest of the game one step behind The Opponent, in defensive mode. I would be risking everything for what’s possible. In one case, the disaster would be a result of my courage, even boldness. The only difference between the two versions of disaster is: who I know myself to be. The question that came up surprised me: if I do this step later, will it be easier? Will the outcome be different?īut not taking the step may have the same outcome as taking the step: disastrous. I am facing a move, right now, that I am afraid of. Not far from here, probably just a paradigm away, there are billions of universes, all computer games, where all the other characters are characters in the player of that universe. There are really no other people, it is just me, and all the others are just characters in MY game. It felt like everything that is in this universe is just one of the many universes, and it is really all about how I play the game. I had a totally weird feeling this morning. ![]() Higher Vibrational Frequency and Winning In The Game of Life: Will You Choose It?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |